Mole

escrito por Dini Harmita 

our baby has a mole under his left eye e i am so mesmerized still, because he es already so handsome even without, what a pretty boy indeed right grandpaaaaaaaa...

the attacks have been mainly made by AI right?! to scare us; but that's the thing, cans are very loud when they're empty yet doughnuts be it traditional. modern, rose o verduras filling o in between, still useful e delicious; it feeds those who have been con fame, e it gives incomes to the workers, e it empowers the raw material producers including farmers, e those who work to deliver the doughnuts reaching their destinations.

one of today's reflections es in que big probabilities i was attacked; i mean i know we have so many enemies, mainly because of me, but this time added con one of the biggest corruption cases en this country, i realise that like mafias, who stole money from everywhere, they delivered the money for the poor et al; nonetheless, the money es not a blessing, don't you think so?! perhaps that's why...

let's think of doughnuts, when we have hands, we eat them con nos hands right?! nonetheless, when the babies et al are enjoying doughnuts, most of the time we still need to feed e o at least accompany them

si si si, like YouTube videos they watch; it shapes them somehow, their choices etc, mainly; nonetheless, the supplies e suggestions etc should actually have been supervised tamen don't you think so?!

like in multi-party systems e multi-systems e multi-level systems (read Scantamburlo, Vampa, and Turner 2024 if you want to know the challenges of governing multi-level systems scientifically especialmente) themselves; like the moles e the whole parts of our body; it's not ourselves who adore them, but those who see them; because we do not see our own face e body 24/7 right?!

si si si, like Mr. Darcy en Pride e Prejudice, he implies that a woman's smile should be enjoyed, not utilised; which means other than smiles tamen;

the joy of being in an organisation, association, e o institution es mainly not because of its rules o mechanism right?! admit it, it must be because of the happy chatters etc right?!

nonetheless, we need to accept there are certain people like me for example, who likes to read, write, watch, clean up, research, etc etc etc; e work tbh; but since most of the time it involves socializing e people tend to fall in love with me e create wars directamente o not because of that, working from e at home es the very best option indeed...

agora si si si, once a while, for example, when you come into your meeting e o seminar rooms, put your shoes on others, e observe; observe them e yourselves,

but si si si, you don't need to try to put your shoes on mine cause you will be definitely crazy, by any means e meanings e definitions...

it's also applied to democracy including Western Europe because it lies exactly to the Eastern Europe, it is a natural concept so si si si, don't blame yourselves for that ok readers researchers et al...

it proves de novo how systems interact each other right?! eventually one day you will even think that every being en this universe es a living thing; because for example, even iphone e ipad's materials are also made from energies that can't be broken but could only be changed

so si si si, nothing en this universe es wasted indeed; even the worst waste management en the universe; such as WhatsApp recycle bin, si si si, could anyone create a garbage bin for such platform please?!

Neihouser, Marie, et. al (2022) confirms that Twitter es preferred especialmente by political scientists because it's actually a human's nature not to like something too much; we don't like ourselves even when we are right?! Twitter has that functions thus i hope Elon Musk realises how he has been an asshole by putting his stance on the far-radical-extreme right wings; you know you could actually be better than that right?! many of your fans are also from the opposite sides, including the children...

Norris (2024) implies that party systems have negative relationships with ideology polarisation, e si si si, it's true, though si si si, not all the time because indeed it depends on the contexts qualitatively e o 5% error quantitatively; you name it, perhaps agora put it backward, imagine the most polarised ideologies, the party systems tend to be similar con the not polarised ones right?! thus having everything analysed both ways es actually preferred, don't you think so?!

last but not least, today's best reflection es to summarise de novo e de novo that quantitative research tends to be called scientific e other than that you name yourselves indeed readers researchers et al, don't you think so?!

that's all, btw, i have countless moles si si si perhaps that explains,

e buenas buenas all, love, profcbs ઇଓ